đ Hey, itâs Wes. Welcome to my weekly newsletter where I share frameworks for becoming a sharper marketer, founder, and builder. If youâre not a subscriber, hereâs what you missed this month:
Subscribe to get access to these posts, and all future posts.
Happy holidays! This weekâs newsletter is a short internal memo I wrote to Mavenâs branding/design agency in spring 2021. I make the case for why company branding should prioritize commerce over art. If you're working on a brand refresh or launch, this can help you get aligned with your designers. Enjoy.
Read time:Â 3 minutes
A year and a half after launching Maven, my cofounders and I hired a branding agency to create a website and logo. The agency was fantastic, but there was one problem:
They kept coming back with logos, icons, color schemes, typefaces, and designs that were what I can only describe as too cool for us.
One day, I wrote the Slack memo below to my cofounders. They loved it and encouraged me to share it directly with our designers. The memo helped frame the projectâand led to a brand identity, website, and logo we were thrilled with.Â
I was 50/50 on whether the designers would be offended, but they received it well and appreciated having a better sense of what we wanted.
Hereâs the note below.
Do we want to be eliteâor elite yet ubiquitous?
Brand designers are cool. Too cool. This is a problem because our customers are probably not that cool, and neither are we.
Thereâs a difference between elite vs elite yet ubiquitous. Some brands are for cool people. These brands are sold at indie boutiques with only one size of each item, hung three inches apart, the store associate doesnât look up when you walk in, and youâre not supposed to touch anything with your plebe fingers.
I mention this because sometimes designers can get too caught up in artsy design vibes.
But we donât want to experiment with a âdistinctive brand colorwayâ or iconography because we want to push the boundaries of design. We want a distinctive brand so we can sell more, make more money, and become a billion-dollar business.
Do designers at Burberry probably hate plaid because itâs overdone and they want to explore more âunexpectedâ concepts? Probably.
Does the plaid continue to drive a huge part of their business because customers dream of rolling up their trench coat sleeves to show a peek of plaid? Yes.Â
Our goal is to be elite yet ubiquitous.
Letâs use Lush as an example. Theyâre a clean cruelty-free skincare brand, which sounds niche, but theyâre in every mall in the US. They have found a way to be quirky and weird and counterculture, but not too quirky, weird, and counterculture. They hit the sweet spot of elite yet ubiquitous.Â
When I say ubiquitous, I mean we want to be Burberry selling at Bloomingdales, Saks, and Nordstrom. Customers donât need to hunt for a retailer that carries Burberry because they all carry it. People who donât know fashion still know Burberry. In other words, Burberry is elite, but they are ubiquitous.Â
On the other hand, there are lots of other luxury clothing brands that are just as elite, but not ubiquitous. Youâd know these brands if youâre into fashion, but most people donât know them. They are a fashion personâs fashion brand. There are elite brands like this in every categoryâweâre not trying to be those brands.
Veuve Clicquot is not the most upscale champagne. Itâs the most upscale champagne everyone knows.
Tiffany & Co is not the most upscale jewelry brand. Itâs the most upscale jewelry brand everyone knows.
Bose isnât the most upscale speaker brand. Itâs the most upscale speaker brand everyone knows.
We want to be a premium brand everyone knows.
On the other hand, our designers buy from brands no one has heard of. They drink artisanal, small-batch, fair-trade whiskey we havenât heard of. They buy knitwear from a Copenhagen label we havenât heard of. They listen to music from artists we havenât heard of.
What our designers find cool will likely be too cool for what we need. Instead, we want them to design a brand they could imagine everyone hearing of, even if itâs basic for their taste, in the same way that Veuve and Tiffany and Bose and Burberry are basic.Â
These brands are basic because they successfully crossed the chasm. They crossed the chasm because they didnât alienate the masses. When we work with our branding agency, letâs make sure to gently remind them:
Prioritize commerce > art.
Iâd love to get your help growing our community of thoughtful, rigorous operators. If you enjoyed this essay, consider sharing it with a friend.
Thanks for being here,
Wes Kao
PS See you next Wednesday at 8am ET.
This is PURE GOLD. You simply stated and provided killer examples for points that many people find difficult to articulate. Love.
Love this Wes. Itâs something I have pondered but you spelled the point out so beautifully with those examples.